New York City’s Board of Health is revisiting regulations in an effort to stem the obesity problem. The board is trying to get a measure passed where people would have better access to the nutritional information of the food they consume.
Under the rules, which officials rewrote after a federal judge struck down similar provisions in September, any chain that operates at least 15 outlets nationwide would have to display calorie content on their menu boards, menus or food tags — essentially wherever the restaurant lists the information that customers use to make their choices.
The proposal will likely be challenged in court, due to implementation problems and restaurant’s hesitation to publish the data. I personally support the measure. It makes sense, you should have access to information about something you are putting in your body. Many will argue the people choosing between the Big Mac and the Bacon-ater are not the calorie counting type, but that isn’t necessarily true. If a person likes both, but knows one is a little better (although terrible) for them, they can make an informed choice.
More to the point it is often confusing or surprising the calorie content of meals. People hear terrible things about places like McDonald’s but then may not associate sit down restaurants for being as bad as they are. I know personally I feel worse when I go to a fast food drive through then if a group of us go out to a nice restaurant.
Did you know for the calories in Olive Garden’s Stuffed Chicken Marsala entree (which is not the worst food at Olive Garden) you could have a Big Mac, a Wendy’s Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger, and a Taco Bell Quesadilla?